Strength of evidence meter with three gauges: strong for what the rules say, moderate for dye mixtures and behaviour in some children, weak for Red 40 alone causing lasting harm at normal intakes.
Original Plate Evidence graphic. Editorial rating, not a formal GRADE assessment. Open full-size graphic.

Is Red 40 actually banned?

Social posts say Red 40 has been banned. It has not. The useful distinction is between an order, a proposal and a request.

What is an order, a proposal and a request?

In US food law an order ends an approval on a set date and binds everyone — the court judgement. A proposal is a step towards an order; it can change, stall or die. A request has no legal force — a polite letter, not a lock on the door.

Three cards: Order, ends an approval on a set date, legally binding; Proposal, a step towards an order, not final; Request, asks industry to act, no legal force, voluntary.
Order, proposal, request — only the first is a ban. Original Plate Evidence graphic. Open full-size graphic.
How much legal force each action has
ActionWhat it doesBinding?
OrderEnds an approval on a set dateYes
ProposalA step towards an order; can still changeNot yet
RequestAsks industry to actNo

Which dyes are actually banned in the US?

  • Brominated vegetable oil (BVO): authorisation revoked from 2 August 2024 (89 FR 55040).
  • Orange B: revoked from 8 September 2026 as abandoned (91 FR 46276).
  • Red 3 (erythrosine): revoked for food from 15 January 2027 and for ingested drugs from 18 January 2028 (90 FR 4628). The FDA lifted its stay on the order on 5 August 2026 (91 FR 50475).
Timeline of US orders: BVO revoked 2 August 2024; Orange B revoked 8 September 2026; Red 3 out of food from 15 January 2027 and ingested medicines from 18 January 2028.
Original Plate Evidence timeline built from 89 FR 55040, 91 FR 46276, 90 FR 4628 and 91 FR 50475. Open full-size graphic.

Red 3 did not fall because of children’s behaviour. The Delaney Clause bars any colour additive found to induce cancer in humans or animals. The evidence was in male rats, and the FDA itself said the rat mechanism does not occur in humans. It is a ban by statute, not a verdict that Red 3 harms people.

On 23 July 2026 the FDA proposed revoking Citrus Red 2, permitted only on the skins of some oranges (91 FR 46330). Comments closed on 24 August 2026; no final order had been issued by 1 November 2026. It remains legal. A proposal is a ban the way a job interview is a salary.

Where does Red 40 actually sit?

On 22 April 2025 HHS and the FDA asked industry to eliminate Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, Blue 2 and Green 3. The original target was the end of 2026; the FDA’s tracker now points to the end of 2027. All six remain approved. Red 40 is still listed at 21 CFR 74.340.

The 22 April 2025 request: HHS and FDA ask industry to remove six dyes, Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, Blue 2 and Green 3. All six are still legally approved.
A request, not a ban. Original Plate Evidence graphic; source: FDA pledge tracker (content current 16 October 2026). Open full-size graphic.

The FDA’s pledge tracker listed 32 company and trade-group entries in mid-October 2026, including General Mills (US cereals and K-12 school foods by summer 2026) and Nestlé (US portfolio by mid-2026). A pledge is a press release, not an inspection. The proof is the ingredient list.

On 29 October 2026 Rep. Nancy Mace introduced H.R. 10936, the Eliminating Dangerous Color Additives Act. It would deem every batch-certified synthetic dye (and its lakes) unsafe in food, drugs, devices and cosmetics two years after enactment. As introduced it has one named sponsor, sits with the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and is not law. Several US states restrict dyes in school food — a canteen rule, not a nationwide shop ban on Red 40.

Is Red 40 banned in Britain or the EU?

Red 40 is Allura Red AC, E129 in Europe — the same dye with a different passport. It is approved in Britain and the EU, not banned. The difference is what the packet has to say about it.

Side-by-side cards: USA, Red 40 (FD&C Red No. 40), approved under 21 CFR 74.340, no mandatory warning; UK/EU, Allura Red E129, same molecule, approved in Britain and the EU, not banned, comes with a warning label.
Same dye, different passport. Original Plate Evidence graphic. Open full-size graphic.

Since 20 July 2010, foods containing any of six colours — E110 sunset yellow, E104 quinoline yellow, E122 carmoisine, E129 allura red, E102 tartrazine and E124 ponceau 4R — must carry the warning: “[name or E number of the colour(s)]: may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children.” That is Annex V of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008, retained in Great Britain.

Illustrative sweet packet labelled Fruit Chews with an ingredients panel reading: Allura red (E129) and sunset yellow (E110): may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children; the six colours are listed below.
Illustrative label, not a real product. Wording from Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 Annex V. Open full-size graphic.

What did the Southampton study actually show?

That warning traces back largely to one trial. McCann and colleagues (The Lancet, 2007; funded by the Food Standards Agency) tested colour mixtures plus sodium benzoate against placebo. Average hyperactivity scores rose slightly with the mixtures.

McCann et al., Lancet 2007 — at a glance
FeatureDetail
ChildrenAbout 300: 153 aged 3, 144 aged 8–9
DesignRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover
TestedTwo colour mixtures, each with sodium benzoate, against placebo
OutcomeHyperactivity scores — not an ADHD diagnosis
ResultSmall average increases with the mixtures

The catch: mixtures, not single dyes. Mix B (sunset yellow, carmoisine, quinoline yellow and allura red) raised hyperactivity scores in the 8–9-year-olds but not the 3-year-olds, according to EFSA. No effect can be pinned on one dye.

Mix A: sunset yellow, carmoisine, tartrazine, ponceau 4R, plus benzoate. Mix B: sunset yellow, carmoisine, quinoline yellow, allura red, plus benzoate; effect in 8 to 9 year olds, not in 3 year olds, per EFSA. Mixtures tested: no single dye can be blamed.
Original Plate Evidence graphic; source: McCann et al. 2007 and the EFSA ANS Panel. Open full-size graphic.

EFSA called the Southampton result limited evidence of a small effect, and in 2009 kept Allura Red’s acceptable daily intake (ADI) — a guideline ceiling, not a personal dose — at 7 mg per kg of body weight per day. EU lawmakers added the warning anyway. The science said “small and uncertain”; the politics said “tell parents”.

Bar chart of the acceptable daily intake for Allura Red / Red 40: US FDA 7 mg/kg, EFSA 7 mg/kg, JECFA 0 to 7 mg/kg; a 20 kg child works out at about 140 mg per day.
FDA, EFSA and JECFA use the same 7 mg/kg figure. For a 20 kg child that is 140 mg a day — arithmetic, not a dose recommendation. EFSA’s refined exposure estimates put typical intakes below the ADI. Open full-size graphic.

California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, April 2021) concluded that synthetic food dyes can affect behaviour in some children, that sensitivity varies, and that federal ADIs rest on studies 35–70 years old not designed to detect behavioural effects. Federal approval did not change.

How do you read the packet?

In the UK, look for the warning sentence, or the colour names and E numbers. In the US, look for “Red 40”, “Allura Red” or “Red 40 Lake”. A lake is a dye bound to a mineral so it doesn’t bleed — like paint mixed with chalk so it stays put. Since 5 February 2026, US products may claim “No artificial colors” if colours come only from natural sources.

What is the status today?

Six status cards as of 9 November 2026: Red 40 USA approved; Red 3 USA banned in food 2027; Allura Red UK warning label; Orange B USA revoked September 2026; Citrus Red 2 USA ban proposed; Red 3 (E127) EU preserved cherries only.
Banned, approved or warned? Original Plate Evidence graphic; status as of 9 November 2026. Open full-size graphic.
Status on 9 November 2026
Dye / placeStatus
Red 40, USAApproved (voluntary removal requested)
Red 3, USABanned in food from 15 Jan 2027
Allura Red E129, UK/EUApproved, with warning label
Orange B, USARevoked from 8 Sep 2026
Citrus Red 2, USABan proposed, not final
Red 3 (E127), EUOnly in certain preserved cherries
Claim check: Red 40 banned in the US? No. Red 3 banned in US food? Yes, January 2027. Six-dye plan a law? No, a request. Red 40 banned in Europe? No. Warning label in Britain? Yes, since 2010. Shown to cause ADHD? Not shown.
Original Plate Evidence graphic. Open full-size graphic.
Viral claims against the record
ClaimVerdict
Red 40 is banned in the USNO
Red 3 is banned in US foodYES, from Jan 2027
The six-dye plan is a lawNO — a request
Red 40 is banned in EuropeNO
Britain requires a warning labelYES, since 2010
Red 40 is shown to cause ADHDNOT SHOWN

On that last line: the Southampton trial measured hyperactivity scores after dye mixtures. It did not test, or show, that any dye causes ADHD.

How strong is the evidence?

  • What the rules say: STRONG — the official record.
  • Dye mixtures nudge behaviour in some children: MODERATE — a real signal, small effects.
  • Red 40 alone causes lasting harm at normal intakes: WEAK — not shown.

Editorial rating, not a formal GRADE assessment.

The verdict

Red 40 is not banned anywhere you are likely to shop. Red 3 is, in US food, from January 2027. Britain and Europe chose a warning label over a ban. If you want fewer synthetic dyes, read the ingredients, not the posts. This is public information explained, not medical or legal advice.

Questions from the label desk

Is Red 40 banned in the US?

No. Red 40 is still approved and listed at 21 CFR 74.340. In April 2025 HHS and the FDA asked industry to remove it and five other dyes, but a request has no legal force.

Is Red 40 banned in the UK or EU?

No. Red 40 is Allura Red AC (E129), approved in Britain and the EU. Foods containing it must carry the warning “may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children”.

Which dye is actually banned in the US?

Red 3 (erythrosine) is revoked for food from 15 January 2027 and ingested drugs from 18 January 2028, under the Delaney Clause. BVO was revoked from August 2024 and Orange B from September 2026.

Does Red 40 cause ADHD?

That has not been shown. The Southampton study found small average increases in hyperactivity scores after dye mixtures with sodium benzoate; it did not test ADHD causation, and no effect could be pinned on one dye.

What is the acceptable daily intake for Allura Red?

FDA, EFSA and JECFA all use 7 mg per kg of body weight per day. EFSA’s refined exposure estimates put typical intakes below that.

Is this medical or legal advice?

No. It is public information explained. Read the primary sources below.

Primary sources and further reading

Corrections welcome. Some FDA and EUR-Lex primary pages were not directly retrievable from our research machine on 9 November 2026; dates were cross-checked against two independent secondary sources. If you spot a discrepancy, tell us and we will correct this page.

Watch the film on YouTube (@PlateEvidence) · Subscribe for a weekly evidence file.

Jonathan Griffiths

Professional bodybuilder · Diploma in Medical Science · BSc Human Nutrition. About the editor →